Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Inaugural

I gotta say, I'm having a bit of an allergic reaction to the pomp, circumstance, fawning, gushing, and self-congratulation. My cynicism modules are revving up.

But only a bit. On the whole, it's a great day and I wish the new President a lot of luck. He's going to need it.

I guess I will attempt to turn my cynicism into detachment. Observe the civic ritual, how it sacralizes power, how it operates to the People's Romance as a marriage ceremony does to a more conventional romance, how it acts as a Schelling point for the coordination of sentiment. One can be a bit suspicious of this process while still joining in the celebration. That is the methodology of the anthropologist, the participant-observer.

6 comments:

Michael said...

Lord Hailsham observed in 1963 that the United States of America are an elective monarchy, in which the monarch rules but does not reign. Britain, by contrast, is a republic with an hereditary life president who reigns but does not rule.

I had to reflect on this as I watched this morning's inaugural ceremony, and heard that its price is in excess of $150 million. The voices that decried the extravagance of Bush's 2004 inauguration (which, comparatively speaking, was a bargain-basement event) are curiously silent about L'Incoronazione di Obama. The British taxpayer is fortunate that his country last had to mount such theatricals 55 years ago, while its actual leadership changes regularly with much less extravagance. We Americans, on the other hand, have to foot the bill every four years.

mtraven said...

Bush's 2004 inauguration (which, comparatively speaking, was a bargain-basement event)...
The story about Obama's inaugural being hugely expensive compared to earlier ones is wingnut crap, throughly debunked here.

The British Royal family costs quite a bit to maintain. I suppose they generate some tourist revenue to compensate; other than that, the material value obtained is difficult to see.

But given that the one of the primary functions of presidents (and the only function of kings) is ceremonial, the costliness of maintaining them is probably vital. Signals of commitment have to be difficult to fake; one way to do that is to make them costly.

Michael said...

A good test of your sincerity might be - would you be making these comments about how vital these costly ceremonials are if McCain had won?

My view is that the American presidency is becoming increasingly ceremonial and decreasingly capable of exerting actual power at about a proportionate pace. When the history of the last century is written a century hence - if it is still permitted then to tell the truth - I believe it will say that the apogee of presidential power took place under the administration of Franklin Roosevelt. It has been downhill since then. Day-to-day authority in today's America is the purview of practically autonomous bureaucracies, and the hard questions are punted to judges whose lifetime appointments insulate them from the consequences of unpopularity. Congress exists for the receipt and disbursement of perquisites and economic rents, while (apart from a real but waning power as commander-in-chief over the armed forces) the president is more and more a figurehead. In a couple more generations, s/he'll be a cutter of ribbons and a christener of ships, and will probably get in trouble with the media (as Prince Philip sometimes does in today's Britain) if s/he has the temerity to express a candid opinion.

mtraven said...

A good test of your sincerity might be - would you be making these comments about how vital these costly ceremonials are if McCain had won?

I don't think you get what I'm saying. It's "vital" in the sense that it is an important part of the political culture; the point is independent of who is being elevated or what his party is.

As for the office being largely ceremonial, I think that's ludicrous. Back in 2000 I was not excited by Al Gore and thought there was not much difference between him and Bush; the years since have proven that to be very wrong. The president has enormous power to set the values and agenda of government, for good or ill.

On the other hand, nobody gets to be president who hasn't already signed on to most of the values of the national security state. So while I am confident that Obama will be much more competent and sane than the previous administration, I expect no radical changes.

Michael said...

So you ARE saying that the ceremonials are important regardless of who is being installed. Thank you! I concede your sincerity on this point.

I didn't say the presidency was entirely ceremonial, only that it was becoming more and more so, in proportion to the erosion of its actual power. I suppose that a U.S. president today has about the same degree of actual authority as, let us say, George IV or William IV did - but very far from that exercised by Elizabeth I, or even the early Stuarts. Given time and the continuation of present trends that authority will be attenuated to the point the British monarchy was after Victoria's death.

A good example of the attenuation of Presidential power is seen in the treatment of the illegal combatants held at Guantanamo. In World War II when the German saboteurs of Operation Pastorius were apprehended, Franklin Roosevelt convened a secret military tribunal that swiftly tried and condemned them to death. FDR told his attorney-general Francis Biddle that he would countenance no interference or delay in their dispatch. The Supreme Court deferred to his authority as commander in chief in Ex parte Quirin (317 U.S. 1 (1942). Six of the eight conspiurators were promptly electrocuted, while FDR commuted the sentences of two who had testified against their fellows.

We may contrast this with the inability of George W. Bush even to complete the trials of leading 9/11 terrorists, much less have them punished. Roosevelt would have emptied Gitmo into the prison lime pit, and that in jig-time. Obama now appears ready to turn its inmates over to the civil courts, and probably couldn't do otherwise even if he wished.

said...

情趣用品,情趣,情色,成人,A片,自拍,情趣用品,情趣,色情,成人影片,色情影片,免費A片,情趣用品,情趣,成人網站,A片下載,日本AV,做愛,情趣用品,情趣,美女交友,A片,辣妹視訊,情色視訊,情趣用品,情趣,色情聊天室,聊天室,AV,成人電影,A片,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣

情色,A片,AIO,AV,日本AV,色情A片,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,A片下載,情色A片,哈啦聊天室,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,色情聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080視訊聊天室,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,免費視訊聊天,上班族聊天室,080中部人聊天室,視訊聊天室,視訊聊天,成人聊天室,一夜情聊天室,辣妹視訊,情色視訊,成人,成人影片,成人光碟,成人影城,自拍

情趣用品,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,日本AV,寄情築園小遊戲,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,色情遊戲,一葉情貼圖片區,色情網站,色情影片,微風成人, 嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人影片,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,080視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室

情趣用品,A片,aio,av,av女優,a漫,免費a片,aio交友愛情館,a片免費看,a片下載,本土自拍,自拍,愛情公寓,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,色情遊戲,嘟嘟情人色網,一葉情貼圖片區,色情影片,情色網,色情網站,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,成人小說,成人電影

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品.情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,視訊聊天室

麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,遊戲,線上遊戲,cs online,搓麻將,矽谷麻將,明星三缺一, 橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,電玩快打

麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,線上遊戲,矽谷麻將,明星3缺一,橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,遊戲區,電玩快打,cs online

情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情竹園小遊戲,色情遊戲,AIO交友愛情館,色情影片,情趣內衣,情趣睡衣,性感睡衣,情趣商品,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室 ,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,080聊天室,視訊交友網,視訊